Reviews for "Sociological Forum"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Sociological Forum 7.3
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers were all experts in the field and enable to propose references to further discuss our arguments.
Their carefull reading pointed tiny points (such as the use of abreviation) that still need improvements.
Their reviews help the manuscript revision.
Sociological Forum 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: It was clear that the editor did not read the reviews thoroughly. The reviews actually contained comments that were totally wrong. The editor did not even notice did, even though the subject of the paper (and thus the reviews) were very much situated in her research field.