Reviews for "Social Science Quarterly"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Social Science Quarterly	60.9 weeks	78.3 weeks	n/a	1	1 (bad)	0 (very bad)	Accepted
Social Science Quarterly	Motivation: The review process was extremely slow and communication with the editors was not fluid.
Social Science Quarterly	Drawn back before first editorial decision after 286 days						Drawn back
Social Science Quarterly	Motivation: The editor failed to find reviewers for this paper. This is quite different from my previous experience with the same journal (and editor), and odd given that the journal recently published an article on a similar topic, and other journals where we tried before did not have this problem. For various reasons we thought that SSQ would be most suited to reach the audience we targeted with this paper, but it did not happen.
Social Science Quarterly	39.6 weeks	47.6 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Social Science Quarterly	Motivation: There were several delays in getting the initial reviews. Once we got past that, things progressed well until the article was delayed in production due to issues with the publisher.
Social Science Quarterly	27.3 weeks	34.0 weeks	n/a	1	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Social Science Quarterly	Motivation: One useful and constructive review plus comments from the editor who has clearly read the paper, too. The paper was conditionally accepted after the first round.