Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.4 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2015
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2013
Motivation: The editor quickly explained how the paper had to be modified and promptly responded to these changes. Quick and efficient review and editing process.
9.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2012
Motivation: The review process was fair and constructive, and the length of the whole process was expectable given the character of the article (length, scope).