Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
10.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
Although we got a "conditional accept" and the reviewers argued that we followed all suggestions of round 1 in a satisfying way, the editor decided to reject the paper. He argued with the journal's backlog.
Further, reviewer 2 had some new comments which she has not mentioned in her first review (and which did not raise because of our revision). The editor argued that manuscripts are rejected, if there are issues remaining after the first revision.
This was the worst experience I've ever had with a review process.
Further, reviewer 2 had some new comments which she has not mentioned in her first review (and which did not raise because of our revision). The editor argued that manuscripts are rejected, if there are issues remaining after the first revision.
This was the worst experience I've ever had with a review process.
7.7 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
7.3 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018