Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.0 weeks
15.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The review process was highly nourished by the executive editor as he suggested some changes in the paper at the first manuscript. After that it was sent to the reviewers. The reviewers were very kind to find the real bottlenecks of the research and write-up in the manuscripts and helped how to change the document. I believe it gradually teaches the researchers.