Reviews for "Small Scale Forestry"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Small Scale Forestry 13.0
n/a 3 5
Motivation: The review process was highly nourished by the executive editor as he suggested some changes in the paper at the first manuscript. After that it was sent to the reviewers. The reviewers were very kind to find the real bottlenecks of the research and write-up in the manuscripts and helped how to change the document. I believe it gradually teaches the researchers.