Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Sleep 2.9
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very professional and efficient review process. This paper was a short peer reviewed Editorial, so this likely contributed to the rapid peer review and editorial speeds. Nonetheless an excellent publishing experience.
Sleep 8.0
weeks
12.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The journal was prompt with handling the manuscript and invited reviewers gave very useful feedback which largely improved the paper. I'm very satisfied with this journal and the output.
Sleep n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Editor alleged that topic would be more adequate for another type of journal, however similar works have been published in the journal in the past. They were quick in providing a decision at least.
Sleep n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)