Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.9 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
Very professional and efficient review process. This paper was a short peer reviewed Editorial, so this likely contributed to the rapid peer review and editorial speeds. Nonetheless an excellent publishing experience.
8.0 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The journal was prompt with handling the manuscript and invited reviewers gave very useful feedback which largely improved the paper. I'm very satisfied with this journal and the output.
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
Editor alleged that topic would be more adequate for another type of journal, however similar works have been published in the journal in the past. They were quick in providing a decision at least.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015