Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
16.3 weeks
28.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1.0 / 5.0
2.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation:
Low quality reviewer comments, and difficulties to get feedback from the editor.
I would have expected a bit more given the reputation of the journal in the field.
I would have expected a bit more given the reputation of the journal in the field.
6.7 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted
6.7 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted