Reviews for "Sexually Transmitted Infections"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Sexually Transmitted Infections 5.7
weeks
9.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Content and editorial reviews were excellent in improving content and language. Adequate reminders were sent regarding re-submission deadline.
Sexually Transmitted Infections 10.4
weeks
12.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Sexually Transmitted Infections 4.3
weeks
6.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Sexually Transmitted Infections n/a n/a 13.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Although the final submission was May 19, I actually submitted it on May 5, after which the editors asked me to provide additional information which created further delays. In my opinion, if they were going to reject the paper they could have done so without asking for the additional information and causing this delay.
Sexually Transmitted Infections 4.3
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: One review was 1 sentence long, asking why anyone would be interested in the topic. The other review addressed unclear abbreviations in tables and made small suggestions for the figures; only substantive question was central to the paper.