Reviews for "Sensors"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Sensors 16.4
weeks
16.6
weeks
n/a 5 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: We had five reviews that really improved our paper. One of the reviewers didn't agree with the rest, but the editors solved this issue and finally published the paper. Our only complaint was the excesive publication fee.
Sensors 3.4
weeks
3.4
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: This time we only had two reviews and our paper was directly accepted. We miss the deepness of the reviews of other times in Sensors.
Sensors 2.7
weeks
2.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: This time the reviews were both fast and rigorous.
Sensors 3.4
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Sensors 5.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: We received 3 reviews. One of them was excellent. We did a lot of work to satisfy this reviewer opinion. Another reviewer was focusing in minor details, which also improved the paper. The last one did a short review. So on the average the review was OK. The first and second reviewer demands really improved a lot the paper, so we were happy with that. Once the manuscript was accepted, the proof-reading and final editing was extremely quick and efficient.
Sensors 9.3
weeks
9.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Clean, speedy, rigorous review process. Tough but fair. Most of the comments from the reviewers contributed to enhance the quality of the manuscript. Great follow up by the associate editor. Overall a good experience.
Sensors 10.6
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fairly smooth. I have only few problems with one of the reviewer tha in my opinion was not a great expert in the field of the manuscript