Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.6 weeks
11.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
Out of three reviewers, one reviewer provided very lengthy and helpful feedback. But it was detailed enough to make up for the other two reviews that did not provide much feedback. Also, the editor was swift in handling the ms and was kind and encouraging.
7.6 weeks
11.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
One of the reviewers provided an extremely long list of comments, which I was initially overwhelmed with. But it eventually helped me improve the paper. The other reviewers had only very minor points. Although my revision was sent to the reviewers again, the editor was very efficient and helpful.