Reviews for "Scientific Data"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Scientific Data | 15.1 weeks |
23.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Submission-to-publication time was eight months. Our first submission somehow got 'lost' in the system. Overall, the time our manuscript spent with the editors was way too long. | |||||||
Scientific Data | 4.0 weeks |
4.0 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 2 (moderate) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: After one month of wait, we received a straight reject email where a reviewer stated that our discoveries were not confirming some scientific statements available in the literature for that topic. That statement did not make any sense: of course, as our article was new, it contained aspects that differ from the current literature. |