Reviews for "Scientific Data"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Scientific Data 4.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: After one month of wait, we received a straight reject email where a reviewer stated that our discoveries were not confirming some scientific statements available in the literature for that topic.
That statement did not make any sense: of course, as our article was new, it contained aspects that differ from the current literature.