Reviews for "Scientific Data"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Scientific Data	4.0 weeks	4.0 weeks	n/a	1	2 (moderate)	1 (bad)	Rejected
Scientific Data	Motivation: After one month of wait, we received a straight reject email where a reviewer stated that our discoveries were not confirming some scientific statements available in the literature for that topic. That statement did not make any sense: of course, as our article was new, it contained aspects that differ from the current literature.