Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
Editors were polite in their rejection, but a 6 week wait time significantly affected my research time line.
13.0 weeks
23.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
STHV editorial team was very supportive throughout the process and we fell that the paper has improved substantially thanks to the review process. Even though the paper has taken a bit long from submission to acceptance, it seems that this delay has been due mainly to the reviewers rather than the editorial team.