Reviews for "Science and Engineering Ethics"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
8.0
weeks
9.1
weeks
n/a 4 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: I have been writing paper for journals for 46 years, and this is one of the best experiences I have had. The referees' comments were extremely useful and I received them within in one month of submission. After I made the revisions I felt my paper was much improved. The whole procedure was very efficient. The website was standard and easy to use, but when I messed up the submission of the revised paper (my fault entirely), I got help immediately that solved the problem.
8.7
weeks
11.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2012
Motivation: This was my first major journal submission and the editor and reviewers were extremely helpful and polite.