Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.0 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: I have been writing paper for journals for 46 years, and this is one of the best experiences I have had. The referees' comments were extremely useful and I received them within in one month of submission. After I made the revisions I felt my paper was much improved. The whole procedure was very efficient. The website was standard and easy to use, but when I messed up the submission of the revised paper (my fault entirely), I got help immediately that solved the problem.
8.7 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012
Motivation: This was my first major journal submission and the editor and reviewers were extremely helpful and polite.