Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Although nobody likes having their manuscript sent back without review, I must highlight that the editor was polite and constructive at all times. He was explicit in that he believed my paper was of value, however, they did not have journal space. They offered to transfer it to a sister journal. The whole process took two days.
1.7 weeks
1.7 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2020
7.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2019
4.1 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
The review process was clear, and the comments from the editor and reviewers were very helpful.
9.3 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2018
61.1 weeks
61.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Three reviewers gave us helpful comments. Though some of them were reasons for rejections, the decision was very transparent.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017