Reviews for "Schizophrenia Bulletin"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Schizophrenia Bulletin | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Schizophrenia Bulletin | n/a | n/a | 2.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Although nobody likes having their manuscript sent back without review, I must highlight that the editor was polite and constructive at all times. He was explicit in that he believed my paper was of value, however, they did not have journal space. They offered to transfer it to a sister journal. The whole process took two days. | |||||||
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 1.7 weeks |
1.7 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 7.0 weeks |
7.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 4.1 weeks |
4.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The review process was clear, and the comments from the editor and reviewers were very helpful. | |||||||
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 9.3 weeks |
9.3 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
Schizophrenia Bulletin | 61.1 weeks |
61.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Three reviewers gave us helpful comments. Though some of them were reasons for rejections, the decision was very transparent. | |||||||
Schizophrenia Bulletin | n/a | n/a | 1.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |