Reviews for "Schizophrenia Bulletin"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
n/a	n/a	7.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2020
n/a	n/a	2.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2020
Motivation: Although nobody likes having their manuscript sent back without review, I must highlight that the editor was polite and constructive at all times. He was explicit in that he believed my paper was of value, however, they did not have journal space. They offered to transfer it to a sister journal. The whole process took two days.
1.7 weeks	1.7 weeks	n/a	4	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Rejected	2020
7.0 weeks	7.0 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Rejected	2019
4.1 weeks	4.1 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Rejected	2019
Motivation: The review process was clear, and the comments from the editor and reviewers were very helpful.
9.3 weeks	9.3 weeks	n/a	4	3 (good)	4 (very good)	Rejected	2018
61.1 weeks	61.1 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Rejected	2017
Motivation: Three reviewers gave us helpful comments. Though some of them were reasons for rejections, the decision was very transparent.
n/a	n/a	1.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2017