Reviews for "Schizophrenia Bulletin"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
Motivation: Although nobody likes having their manuscript sent back without review, I must highlight that the editor was polite and constructive at all times. He was explicit in that he believed my paper was of value, however, they did not have journal space. They offered to transfer it to a sister journal. The whole process took two days.
1.7
weeks
1.7
weeks
n/a 4 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected 2020
7.0
weeks
7.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2019
4.1
weeks
4.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected 2019
Motivation: The review process was clear, and the comments from the editor and reviewers were very helpful.
9.3
weeks
9.3
weeks
n/a 4 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2018
61.1
weeks
61.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2017
Motivation: Three reviewers gave us helpful comments. Though some of them were reasons for rejections, the decision was very transparent.
n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017