Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
21.1 weeks
34.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
15.3 weeks
37.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Fifteen weeks after receiving the manuscript the reviewer said us that, as part of this work was presented in a Conference and accesible in pdf, they couldn't publish it. We pointed out that the manuscript sent to the journal had much more work, so they decided to continue the revision process.
15.3 weeks
15.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
They review process took too long for such a poor report.
There is no option to reply to the editor or the reviewers.
There is no option to reply to the editor or the reviewers.