Reviews for "Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 2.9
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: I am very satisfied with the editorial process of the journal. The editor was very helpful and responded very quickly to some questions I had regarding the editorial process. The turnover was very fast. I have received the comments of the peer-reviewers three weeks after submission. The comments were constructive in nature and helped me finesse the manuscript. It was accepted shortly after I had submitted the manuscript after the suggested revisions. Once the article was published online, I was notified via email, containing all the information and an active DOI, the same day. In addition, the editorial team was very meticulous and took great care to ensure that the final layout would be approved by the respective author and that all information was correct prior to publication—something that does not usually get consulted with manuscript authors. Overall, I would highly recommend this journal to my fellow academics in the field of security studies.
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 0.0
weeks
0.0
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 30.4
weeks
31.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Time to the first decision was slow, but after 1st review was more quickly.
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: After an internal review process by the editor, I was notified that my article did not fit the journal’s aims and scope. The Editor took care to offer an explanatory and encouraging reply, providing advice on other journals to submit my article and suggestions on how to improve it.
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 0.7
weeks
1.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: La experiencia fue excelente, todo el proceso se llevo a cabo de manera transparente y rigurosa, lo que permitió que siempre estuviera informada, satisfecha con los resultados y con la mayor disposición.
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 1.9
weeks
1.9
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very good experience with the journal.
Serious processes... allright.
Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova 0.4
weeks
0.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted