Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
0 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2025
Motivation:
Although the response was a rejection (on the basis of inappropriate fit for the journal), I appreciated the rapid (same day!) response and the friendly tone. An exemplary experience.
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
Review was fast and reviewer comments were reasonable. I would submit manuscripts to this journal again.
6.0 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The highlight of the review process was that it was very fast. The editor was very efficient and responsive. Most of the comments from the reviewers made sense and were very reasonable. Overall it was a positive experience for me.