Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
The duration of the review process for this journal was satisfactory and the staff made it a point to update all authors at the soonest possible time. The peer review inputs were generally favorable and agreeable; however, one of the reviewers may have likely attempted to "citation hack" which we respectfully declined.