Reviews for "Regional Environmental Change"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Regional Environmental Change | 24.1 weeks |
27.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The length of the first review was exceptionally long. However, the editors were responsive to my inquiries during the lengthy review | |||||||
Regional Environmental Change | n/a | n/a | 15.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Our manuscript was rejected without review. It took the journal quite a while to make this decision (just over 2 weeks). However, the submission process was relatively straightforward. | |||||||
Regional Environmental Change | 8.9 weeks |
8.9 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Although only one reviewer's comments were taken into account, these were very extensive and helpful. The process took a bit longer than a was hoping - I would prefer receiving a rejection sooner (not after two months). |