Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.1 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
Editor did a great work in handling this reviewing proccess. He read the comments, incorporated himself suggestions. Very fast and constructive replys.
24.1 weeks
27.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The length of the first review was exceptionally long. However, the editors were responsive to my inquiries during the lengthy review
n/a
n/a
15 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
Our manuscript was rejected without review. It took the journal quite a while to make this decision (just over 2 weeks). However, the submission process was relatively straightforward.
8.9 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
Although only one reviewer's comments were taken into account, these were very extensive and helpful. The process took a bit longer than a was hoping - I would prefer receiving a rejection sooner (not after two months).