Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
37.1 weeks
39.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2026
Motivation:
The peer review process was somewhat slow; they had to invite nearly 10 reviewers because some declined the invitation or failed to meet the deadline. However, once they received the reviewers’ comments, they were extremely helpful in improving the manuscript. Likewise, the editors provided their own valuable feedback. I think that’s something noteworthy about this journal—that they continued to seek out reviewers. The language editing process was also helpful, and any changes were submitted to me for approval before being implemented.