Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
0.1 weeks
0.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5.0 / 5.0
5.0 / 5.0
Accepted
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5.0 / 5.0
5.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation: The judging process was faster than I thought, and at the same time, the necessary accuracy was used in the judging.
Interactions with the journal were accompanied by respectful interactions from the editor.
0.7 weeks
0.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5.0 / 5.0
5.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation: The prompt and high-quality review of my article in this journal was truly enjoyable.
2.9 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5.0 / 5.0
5.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation: This journal meets the important criteria of speed and accuracy in article reviewing.
1.9 weeks
2.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5.0 / 5.0
5.0 / 5.0
Accepted