Reviews for "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 13.0
weeks
17.1
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was very fast. The journal team always kept us informed about the stages the paper was going through, the editors were very prompt in replying to emails. I highly recommend this journal.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 15.3
weeks
15.3
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 13.0
weeks
41.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The process was a bit slow, but the comments raised by the reviewers and editor were highly useful. In the first submission, it seems they were not understanding the aim of the paper correctly. Once we had the opportunity to resubmit after rewriting, they were very helpful and constructive, pointing out problems that the authors were unaware of, and suggesting improvements. I think the manuscript improved a lot thanks to this feedback. The reviewers were anonymous but clearly experts in the field.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19.1
weeks
33.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11.0
weeks
14.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Editorial process was fast. Editor was careful and reasonable.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10.7
weeks
22.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: a bit slow, but thorough, fair reviews