Reviews for "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Motivation: My comments on a paper published in QJEP, to which I previously had been a reviewer for other journals, were summarily rejected by the editor-in-chief. Although she claimed to have carefully read the comment, she showed no knowledge of its content. Other considerations, which were not explained to me, must have played a role.
13.0
weeks
17.1
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: The review process was very fast. The journal team always kept us informed about the stages the paper was going through, the editors were very prompt in replying to emails. I highly recommend this journal.
15.3
weeks
15.3
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2018
13.0
weeks
41.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The process was a bit slow, but the comments raised by the reviewers and editor were highly useful. In the first submission, it seems they were not understanding the aim of the paper correctly. Once we had the opportunity to resubmit after rewriting, they were very helpful and constructive, pointing out problems that the authors were unaware of, and suggesting improvements. I think the manuscript improved a lot thanks to this feedback. The reviewers were anonymous but clearly experts in the field.
19.1
weeks
33.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
11.0
weeks
14.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: Editorial process was fast. Editor was careful and reasonable.
10.7
weeks
22.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: a bit slow, but thorough, fair reviews