Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
Fast and courteous response, somewhat constructive, a positive experience despite the desk rejection.
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
They have been quick, very polite, clear in explaining the process and the decision. Reports were useful (2 out of 4).
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
In spite of the extremely quick and, to us, disappointing decision, the editor had carefully reviewed the paper, provided valuable feedback, motivated the decision convincingly, and suggested alternative outlets.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
The reason made it obvious that the editor did not even bother to read the introduction, likely did not even make it through the abstract