Reviews for "Qualitative Health Research"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Qualitative Health Research | 6.0 weeks |
6.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Review was prompt and the quality of the review feedback was good. However, the journal advised that the article be substantially revised and resubmitted to a different (new) journal instead. It appeared to be simultaneously a rejection from this particular journal, and an invitation to revise and resubmit to a different one, with no explanation of why (or if) this alternative journal was more appropriate, if indeed that was why the decision was made in this way. | |||||||
| Qualitative Health Research | 3.7 weeks |
7.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: From the first review 2 out of 3 reviewers gave very positive comments, but the 2 very positive review reports were ignored and it was sent out for a second review with the one negative reviewer again, and another reviewer. | |||||||
@scirev