Reviews for "Public Opinion Quarterly"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Public Opinion Quarterly 12.4
weeks
12.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: One reviewer didn't think this was novel enough, and that was enough to sink the paper.
Public Opinion Quarterly 13.3
weeks
13.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Public Opinion Quarterly 4.9
weeks
8.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was very quick and all comments were clear and fair. I may have been lucky that it was a slack time of year for reviewers (Dec/Jan) but as an author I could not have asked for more!
Public Opinion Quarterly 10.0
weeks
17.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fairly raid. Most comments were fair and the editor allowed me to argue that one or two comments should be ignored.
Public Opinion Quarterly 14.1
weeks
14.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: There were two acceptance (revise&resumbmit) and one rejection, so the editor could give us chance (also considering that the paper was highly published at the end). Nevertheless, the reviews were of a good quality
Public Opinion Quarterly 5.9
weeks
17.3
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted