Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.6 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
3
Rejected
2018
3.9 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2015
Motivation: At least the rejection was timely. However, the reviews were one paragraph each which wasn't particularly helpful. Also, editor indicated paper should have psychophys data which ours did not (it was a methods paper), but the journal has published similar papers in the past.