Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: The reviewer comments were helpful and reasonable, but the process took too long. There was no need to send out the second revision to the reviewers again (only a handful of very minor changes) and an editorial decision could have been made at this point already.
Motivation: The review time was good, and the content of the reviews made sense - although we did not agree with all the points made by reviewers.