Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
As participants in a workshop's shared task, we were specifically solicited to submit a journal article for a special issue arranged by the workshop organizers. An earlier version of our paper had therefore already undergone a round of peer reviews for publication in the workshop proceedings. The submission requirements for the journal did not give too much extra space for new material, which probably explains why the reviews we got were fairly positive and did not identify too many areas for improvement. The editors asked us to prepare a camera-ready submission incorporating the reviewers' suggestions (or at least, those that were practical), along with a response to the reviews, but this camera-ready submission was published without going through another round of reviews.