Reviews for "Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 4.4
weeks
7.6
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: The review process was overall very good and fast.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 16.1
weeks
27.6
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
1
(bad)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: Longest review process I ever experienced, which made the overall process very unsatisfactory, despite the reasonable quality of the review reports.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Motivation: The editor board member did provide some constructive comments and alternative journals for future submission.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 11.1
weeks
11.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 7.9
weeks
10.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The reviews were very helpful and the overall process was very fast.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: After a positive answer on our presubmission enquiry, surprisingly, the paper was rejected by the editorial board member who deemed it "too specialized".
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences n/a n/a 18.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2013
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 3.6
weeks
3.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: Excellent and timely handling. Good comments and the editor made some additional good points.
Proofreading stage was also very impressive and of high quality.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 3.7
weeks
3.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2015
Motivation: The reviews were really helpful and encouraging, but the editor rejected the paper due to lack of impact.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 6.0
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2015
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 24.0
weeks
24.0
weeks
n/a 3 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2014
Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 10.0
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2014