Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
29.7 weeks
29.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
One reviewer recommended the publication of the article and the second reviewer said that the topic was not suitable for the journal without any other comment.
The editor rejected the paper because the topic was not suitable for the journal.
It took 6 months to decide that the topic was not suitable for the journal.
The editor rejected the paper because the topic was not suitable for the journal.
It took 6 months to decide that the topic was not suitable for the journal.