Reviews for "Population, Space and Place"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Population, Space and Place 18.9
weeks
25.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviews we received were very helpful and to the point. We were therefore highly disappointed when the only reply we received upon submitting a revised version - which we thought addressed the concerns raised in the reviews - was an outright rejection without any motivation whatsoever. Even upon inquiring we received no explanation for the rejection from the editor.
Population, Space and Place 16.6
weeks
30.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The process was long, but the paper was significantly improved. The comments were fair and extremely detailed.
Population, Space and Place 9.0
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected
Population, Space and Place n/a n/a 13.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Population, Space and Place 15.2
weeks
15.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Population, Space and Place 13.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: I am very satisfied about my submissions to this journal. The comments of the reviewers always helped to improve the article.