Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.9 weeks
25.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
The reviews we received were very helpful and to the point. We were therefore highly disappointed when the only reply we received upon submitting a revised version - which we thought addressed the concerns raised in the reviews - was an outright rejection without any motivation whatsoever. Even upon inquiring we received no explanation for the rejection from the editor.
16.6 weeks
30.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The process was long, but the paper was significantly improved. The comments were fair and extremely detailed.
9.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
15.2 weeks
15.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014
13.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
I am very satisfied about my submissions to this journal. The comments of the reviewers always helped to improve the article.