Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
10.8 weeks
41.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Decent referees, but editor was not responsive. Editor had decided to publish after second round of revisions was provided, but never told me s/he had decided to publish until five to six months later when I emailed them personally asking for an update. As a result I wasn't able to list this paper as forthcoming on my CV for the job market that year...
21.3 weeks
21.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
A bit slow. No reason given for rejection. Reviews were rather positive so not obvious why decision was made to reject. Thorough reviews, polite and rather constructive.