Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.4 weeks
28.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Reviewers expert on the field. The process was really fast and the editor was really communicative. He did not send it out to an unnecessary third round of reviews after minor changes. However, the paper handling by Elsevier is bad, proof plenty of mistakes, references without crossref, and errors even after publication.
12.4 weeks
17.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
- The review-process was exceptionally thorough. Very critical and extensive feedback.
- The duration was very reasonable.
Very satisfied!
- The duration was very reasonable.
Very satisfied!
21.9 weeks
41.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
As always, Poetics has very good reviewers (also the editor gave a lot of very good feedback). But the review process is OH SO SLOW!
25.7 weeks
25.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2014
26.0 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Greater editors (they also give very good and constructive comments) and generally great reviewers.