Reviews for "Poetics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Poetics 10.4
weeks
28.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Reviewers expert on the field. The process was really fast and the editor was really communicative. He did not send it out to an unnecessary third round of reviews after minor changes. However, the paper handling by Elsevier is bad, proof plenty of mistakes, references without crossref, and errors even after publication.
Poetics 12.4
weeks
17.3
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: - The review-process was exceptionally thorough. Very critical and extensive feedback.
- The duration was very reasonable.
Very satisfied!
Poetics 21.9
weeks
41.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: As always, Poetics has very good reviewers (also the editor gave a lot of very good feedback). But the review process is OH SO SLOW!
Poetics 25.7
weeks
25.7
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Poetics 26.0
weeks
30.4
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Greater editors (they also give very good and constructive comments) and generally great reviewers.