Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.6 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Very good and constructive reviews. I did further deep study and added more relevant information which I think added more value to the manuscript.
10.1 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Review comments were good and indicated that the reviewers were good in the field and have gone through the manuscript thoroughly.
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: A GOOD JOURNAL PUBLISHING REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES ENCOURAGING AND KINDLING THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012
Motivation: The review process is very quick