Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.6 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Very good and constructive reviews. I did further deep study and added more relevant information which I think added more value to the manuscript.
10.1 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Review comments were good and indicated that the reviewers were good in the field and have gone through the manuscript thoroughly.
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
A GOOD JOURNAL PUBLISHING REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES ENCOURAGING AND KINDLING THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The review process is very quick