Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
9.3 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Just a quick add-on comment:
I was very busy with other matters during the submission process of this paper, which elongated the review process. Although the editor and the journal staff were helpful, patient and undestanding along the way, If I could've focused on the revisions better, and submitted them faster, the process could've been even faster.
I was very busy with other matters during the submission process of this paper, which elongated the review process. Although the editor and the journal staff were helpful, patient and undestanding along the way, If I could've focused on the revisions better, and submitted them faster, the process could've been even faster.
2.7 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2.7 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
8.1 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Drawn back
Motivation:
Long review process. Editor seemed to, despite positive comments, not dare to accept the manuscript.
13.0 weeks
15.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
6.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted