Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.0 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Very reasonabvle reviews, positive but critical. Helped to improved and focus the paper. The editor was very keen in obtaining graphics and figures of high quality and in a very specific way, which actually imporved the presentation. Happy with it and will submit more work to PCA