Reviews for "Physics Letters A"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Physics Letters A n/a n/a 63.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Editor mentioned that he tried 8 reviewers but none of them agrees to review the manuscript. He think that the manuscript does not project a sense of importance that could warrant publication in PLA.
Physics Letters A 6.0
weeks
12.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Two reviewers suggested some minor changes before acceptance. Third reviewer feels that manuscript shows new results but suitable for more specific optical journal. After revision manuscript was accepted.
Physics Letters A 6.1
weeks
6.1
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Physics Letters A 30.4
weeks
60.8
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Physics Letters A 9.4
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 1 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Theoretical papers are sent to referees who are experts in experiment and vice versa. Referee reports are not logical with respect to the content of the manuscript and mostly motivated by the own ideas of the referees.
Physics Letters A 10.0
weeks
10.0
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Manuscripts are sent to non-expert reviewers.