Reviews for "Physics Letters A"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Physics Letters A | 6.1 weeks |
6.1 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 3 (good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Physics Letters A | 30.4 weeks |
60.8 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Physics Letters A | 9.4 weeks |
9.4 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Theoretical papers are sent to referees who are experts in experiment and vice versa. Referee reports are not logical with respect to the content of the manuscript and mostly motivated by the own ideas of the referees. | |||||||
| Physics Letters A | 10.0 weeks |
10.0 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 0 (very bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Manuscripts are sent to non-expert reviewers. | |||||||
@scirev