Reviews for "Physical Review Applied"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Physical Review Applied | n/a | n/a | 20.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Initial screening time is too long. It took 3 weeks and I didn't get any comments regarding the contents. | |||||||
Physical Review Applied | 8.3 weeks |
9.4 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review process was rigorous and the handling time of our manuscript was reasonable. The copy edit process was also rigorous and the grammar of our manuscript was significantly improved in the final published version. | |||||||
Physical Review Applied | n/a | n/a | 11.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Physical Review Applied | 10.3 weeks |
10.3 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The motiviation provided by the reviewer was not correct in my opinion |