Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.9 weeks
38.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The process was too slow. In the second and third round of review, little changes were generally requested by reviewers, however it took to much time to have the following decisions by the editor
5.1 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The overall process was very fast and I had a good experience with this journal.
10.9 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
Relatively speedy handling.
Editor made his own judgement about reviewer comments, based on their quality.
Pretty bad post-acceptance proof processing by the production staff.
Editor made his own judgement about reviewer comments, based on their quality.
Pretty bad post-acceptance proof processing by the production staff.
8.9 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The review reports were of high quality and contained many helpful comments. The amount of time for reviews, revisions and editorial decisions was appropriate.
6.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
The comments received from reviewers were mostly helpful, but the reason for the rejection (instead of revise and resubmit) was not given.