Reviews for "Personnel Review"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Personnel Review 11.7
weeks
11.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: One reviewer recommends accepted, while a second reviewer recommended a rejection. According to reviews, Associate Editor decided to reject the paper.
Personnel Review 25.3
weeks
25.3
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Rejection due to the reason of not finding reviewers after 23 weeks means how serious they have been working.
I am sorry to hear these from a reputable journal in the field.
Personnel Review 2.3
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The comments were fair and improved the quality of my paper. I sent my manuscript July 2nd and got the response on November 2nd and for the second round sent Dec. 11th and got the response on Feb 11th. It seems the journal follows the deadlines strictly (4 months for the first round and two months for the second round). The process was really smooth although the comments were challenging.
Personnel Review 52.1
weeks
52.1
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Even when the reviews were in, it took the editor months to make/ communicate his/her decision.