Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.0 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
11.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
One reviewer recommends accepted, while a second reviewer recommended a rejection. According to reviews, Associate Editor decided to reject the paper.
25.3 weeks
25.3 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
Rejection due to the reason of not finding reviewers after 23 weeks means how serious they have been working.
I am sorry to hear these from a reputable journal in the field.
I am sorry to hear these from a reputable journal in the field.
2.3 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The comments were fair and improved the quality of my paper. I sent my manuscript July 2nd and got the response on November 2nd and for the second round sent Dec. 11th and got the response on Feb 11th. It seems the journal follows the deadlines strictly (4 months for the first round and two months for the second round). The process was really smooth although the comments were challenging.
52.1 weeks
52.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2012
Motivation:
Even when the reviews were in, it took the editor months to make/ communicate his/her decision.