Reviews for "Pattern Recognition"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Pattern Recognition | 13.4 weeks |
13.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 0 (very bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Bad quality of the reviewer's feedback. Even (and perhaps more importantly) when a manuscript is rejected, and specially after several months awaiting for their input, one would expect to find some valuable or constructive criticism in the reviewer's comments. This was not the case. | |||||||
| Pattern Recognition | 17.4 weeks |
21.7 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: I have two papers accepted in Pattern Recognition and, in my opinion, it is a great journal. I have two more papers being revised in this journal and I really recommend it. | |||||||
@scirev