Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.9 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
7 reports
Rejected
2025
Motivation:
my article was sent to 7 reviewers and 5 of them asked for rejection while two asked for revisions, i think sending one article to 7 reviewers is abit too much and i have not heard of this before, but it is okay because i am planning to follow the reviewers suggestion and after i am done i plan to submit the article again to this journal.
the only thing that is not good is the first decision time which took about a month, and also when the review was finished it took about two weeks almost for the editors to give me the final decision , so i think that time can be saved by making it abit faster.
the only thing that is not good is the first decision time which took about a month, and also when the review was finished it took about two weeks almost for the editors to give me the final decision , so i think that time can be saved by making it abit faster.
7.1 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The revision were good and helpful. The revision process was too fast.
12.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
13.4 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
Bad quality of the reviewer's feedback. Even (and perhaps more importantly) when a manuscript is rejected, and specially after several months awaiting for their input, one would expect to find some valuable or constructive criticism in the reviewer's comments. This was not the case.
17.4 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
I have two papers accepted in Pattern Recognition and, in my opinion, it is a great journal. I have two more papers being revised in this journal and I really recommend it.