Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.9 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2026
Motivation: The journal provided a swift and efficient review process, and the editor and reviewers offered constructive feedback that helped strengthen the manuscript and improve readability. It is therefore recommended as a suitable venue for submitting patient-reported outcome studies.
9.0 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The submission process went smoothly, and the reviewers offered constructive feedback that helped refine the manuscript, making it clearer and stronger.
6.6 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The journal offered a transparent and efficient process from submission through revision and proofreading. It was a positive experience to submit our manuscript here. I would recommend this journal to peers conducting related research as a valuable platform for disseminating their work.
7.1 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The journal offered a prompt and transparent review process, enabling the manuscript to be refined effectively. It is advisable to submit a manuscript to this journal.
7.3 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2022
Motivation: The reviewers provided constructive feedback to help craft the manuscript in a sound manner. I recommend colleagues to submit their research related to adherence issues to this journal.