Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.1 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The first review process was quite long, due to one of the external reviewers being very late in his reply.
The editor was very understanding and quick to react.
The editor was very understanding and quick to react.