Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
82 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Understandably, if a paper does not fit the journal, then it should be rejected. But taking about 3 months for a desk rejection is perhaps too long and unprofessional.
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012
Motivation:
The review process was very surprising for my coauthorand I because we wrote the article following the structure of the article in the journal and we thought that our work couldfit with the journal. We asked to the journal a more precise explanation respect the evaluation done respect our work but they answer that it was not possible because they receive "hundreds of submissions" and their policy is to first screen articles as to fit in terms of our aims and objectives before going to the next step of developmental reviews. Our article not reached this second step to give us more feedback.