Reviews for "Optics Communications"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Optics Communications | 3.3 weeks |
3.3 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Reviewer feels that the calculation was useful but not exactly matches the experimental results. He also feels that the physical interpretation of experimental and calculated results should be described in more detail. | |||||||
| Optics Communications | 7.1 weeks |
7.3 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: I always rate Optics Communications a very good journal. The editor and reviewers are quite professional, always fair and they judge the work on the basis of its quality and provide constructive comments. Our experience with this manuscript was quite good. | |||||||