Reviews for "Open Linguistics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Open Linguistics 17.4
weeks
21.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Efficient process that also improved the manuscript.
Open Linguistics 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Reviewers were relatively fast and quite helpful. Verdict was 'minor revisions'. Time from acceptance to publication was longer than expected given the review process, and working with the typesetters was challenging (no direct contact possible, and corrections on proofs are not always handled systematically).
Open Linguistics 5.0
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The reviews were from experts in the subfield, came in swiftly and were quite helpful. After publication, the journal manager shared our paper with many of the people whose research we cited, thus drawing attention to our work. We were happy with this exposure, as we had picked Open Linguistics specifically because its open access nature.
Open Linguistics 5.0
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Good, knowledgeable reviewers. Helpful editorial assistance.