Reviews for "Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 22.7
weeks
22.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Decent duration of the review process. Two out three reviews of good quality, which certainly improved the manuscript, although the paper was rejected.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23.0
weeks
38.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The review process took very long - almost a year passed between submission and rejection. The critics which lead to rejection were merely mentioned in the first review round, and the efforts put into revising the paper seemed not be taken into account for the final decision. Therefore, the review process and outcome were quite frustrating. The paper was accepted in a journal with similar quality with minor revisions afterwards.