Reviews for "Nonlinear Dynamics"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Nonlinear Dynamics	23.9 weeks	23.9 weeks	n/a	2	5 (excellent)	4 (very good)	Rejected
Nonlinear Dynamics	Motivation: Takes for a long time.
Nonlinear Dynamics	4.0 weeks	4.0 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Rejected
Nonlinear Dynamics	Motivation: The reports were timely and professionally written.
Nonlinear Dynamics	19.7 weeks	23.0 weeks	n/a	2	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Nonlinear Dynamics	Motivation: The submission of the paper was handled in a very efficient way by the editor. The overall process of review was quick and constructive. Reviewers' comments denoted a high knowledge of the subject and they certainly improved the manuscript.
Nonlinear Dynamics	4.3 weeks	4.3 weeks	n/a	2	0 (very bad)	1 (bad)	Rejected
Nonlinear Dynamics	Motivation: The reviewers were not expert in the field of the paper and their comments were meaningless and some of them were theoritically incorrect. Generally, the reviwers' comments did not contain helpful information and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.