Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.1 weeks
11.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
The review process was speedy and the manuscript was sent to three reviewers over two rounds which overall greatly improved its quality. The editor handled the manuscript in a timely manner.
9.0 weeks
13.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
We received timely and quality comments to our review manuscript. Everything was handled during an average timeframe (about 1 month from submission to decision each time). Reviewers were fair with their comments, and the resulting manuscript benefitted from the suggestions.
4.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
5 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Professional editorial office. Reviewers seemed to be the experts in the field. There were a lot of reviewers though (5 of them!) and all questions need to be properly addressed. The manuscript was much improved after the reviewing process.
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
6.4 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
33.4 weeks
33.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2017