Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
Despite having 2 relevant review reports with suggested changes, and one reviewer that discussed the lack of novelty of our paper, the editor decided to reject it motivating "low priority".
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
The manuscript had a quick turn-around and the reviewer comments were informed, straightforward, and applicable to the manuscript.
5.9 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
I received two reviews. The first was opinionated without supporting facts. The second was a reasonable review with objective critiques. Ultimately, no reason for the rejection was given except for the standard "not high enough priority." However, based on the available reviewer comments this could not be put in perspective.