Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Rejected
2023
Motivation: The manuscript had a quick turn-around and the reviewer comments were informed, straightforward, and applicable to the manuscript.
5.9 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Rejected
2017
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
0
0
Rejected
2013
Motivation: I received two reviews. The first was opinionated without supporting facts. The second was a reasonable review with objective critiques. Ultimately, no reason for the rejection was given except for the standard "not high enough priority." However, based on the available reviewer comments this could not be put in perspective.